Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category.

Chrysler offeres $2.99 per gallon for 3 years promotion

Chrysler has offered customers of its Chrysler, Jeep and Dodge brands to refuel at the price of $2.99 per gallon over the next three years.

This is being done to help boost their sales. With the U.S. purchase of a Chrysler, Jeep or Dodge the customer will recieve a fuel card that immediatly lowers the fuel price to $2.99 per gallon, where it will stay for 3 years. Another bonus on the campaign Chrysler will be offering $3,000 cash back on some models. Continue reading ‘Chrysler offeres $2.99 per gallon for 3 years promotion’ »

Toyota is rasing the car prices in US

accroding to http://www.easycarblog.com/
Toyota is facing its first profit drop in almost a decade, so they have decided to raise their prices in the U.S due to high raw material prices and the weakening of the U.S dollar.

Toyota will first raise the prices of the cars imported to the U.S, whilst the cars which are locally manufactured will only raise later in the month. Toyota has a strong focus on fuel-efficiency and reliability, and this should stay the same even though there will be new prices.

The petrol-electric Prius should get around a 1.8% price increase, meaning the base model will be around $380 more expensive and the Touring model will be around $420 more expensive. The Toyota Yaris will have a price increase of around 1.7% so it will be around a $200 price increase.

Toyota is set to build a new plant in India for range of low cost cars which will be designed to rival the Tata Nano.

Auto insurance quotes should not raise due to the price hike.
and accroding to http://www.japantoday.com/category/business/view/toyota-to-raise-prices-in-us

NEW YORK —

Toyota Motor Corp will raise its automobile prices in the U.S. market later this month. Toyota said it will lift its suggested retail price by 0.9% for the 2009 model year Camry sedan, 1.6% for the 2008 Yaris sedan and 1.8% for the 2008 Prius hybrid vehicle.

The suggested price will go up by 1.1% for the 2008 RAV4 sport-utility vehicle and 0.3% for the 2008 Tundra full-size pickup truck. The company decided on the markup by taking into account the impact of the yen’s recent appreciation against the dollar and the pricing strategies of other automakers, a Toyota spokesman said.

Meanwhile, Toyota will keep unchanged the prices of five models, including the Corolla car, the Tacoma pickup truck and the Sequoia full-size SUV.

Carlsson modifiy Mercedes SL500 into CK50

German tuner Carlsson has modified the new Mercedes SL500.

The new CK50 package from Carlsson has performance figures which will be able to rival the SL63. Carlsson has given the reworked car a new exterior to match the power and mods which have been done. The interior has also been updated.

The car was boosted from 388hp (285kW) to 436hp (325kW) and 600Nm of torque. The new Carlsson version of the SL500 (Known as the SL550 in North America) will reach 0-100km/h in 5.1 seconds and it will have a top speed of 293km/h.

Carlsson is now busy developing a kit for the v12-powered SL600 which will be expected to push-out more than 700hp (522kW) and 1,100Nm of torque.

The price and auto insurance quotes for the Carlsson CK50 will be announced soon.

Price: No price yet
Auto Insurance: No auto insurance quote given yet

Who is Carlsson?
Carlsson is a German company based in Merzig, some 10 kilometres from the French border. Many Mercedes-Benz drivers want to enhance the performance and looks of their cars, and Carlsson satisfies this demand.
They focus all their energies exclusively in designing enhancements for Mercedes-Benz, offering a range of engine and suspension modifications, aerodynamic body components, and sophisticated alloy wheels.

Standardized prices

Okay, call me crazy but I think one of the best things we could do as an industry is standardize USAGE prices. You’ve heard me say this before and yes, I’m saying it again. To be clear, I’m not talking about Creative Fees, but the Usage Licensing Fee alone. It would make life so much easier for everyone involved in the photography business–photograhers AND buyers–and I think it would actually increase the income for many photographers.

Imagine how much less stress there would be in doing an estimate for a client if you knew that, (totally hypothetically) the one year US exclusive print advertising in national consumer magazine ads up to one page was $25,000–and if your client knew that too. Your Creative Fee would be based on your creative value to the project (a function perhaps of time and effort and experience, and how important your particular creative style is to the project) so that would vary from photographer to photographer, but the variation in total project price between any three photographers would be much less than we see now in estimates(bids).

This would enable buyers to more easily work with the best photographer (creatively) for any given project because they would not have to get past the huge price differences they get now. For example, in the project usage mentioned above, it is completely possible that the Creative and Usage fees (total) would be $35K for one photographer, $25K for another, and $7500 for a third. Try getting that $35K photographer the gig when the cost consultants and the end-client are completely wrapped up in the numbers! Buyers have to fight hard (sometimes) to get the right photographer for the project in these situations!

Of course, this is not how things have historically been done–with standardized numbers. But guess what–today isn’t yesterday and tomorrow demands a new way of working. I think we really have a shot at creating some sort of fair and equitable system now, and we should be putting our heads together to see how we can make this happen…WITH our buying colleagues. Let’s work together to find a realistic solution to these difficult issues of usage pricing so that we can focus our attention on creating great work.

I’ve mentioned before the idea of tying usage prices to media buys–that is still an option I think, but it is only one idea. I am certainly open to others and want to encourage a dialogue on this topic. However, I mean a dialogue on possibilities–not “that’s not the way it worked in the past” or “that’s stupid” or “I should get to charge whatever I want” kinds of comments, please. I’m asking you to open up your minds and brainstorm on forward-thinking ideas. Lots of them won’t work, but if we don’t try to find some solutions now, we’ll (potentially) lose the opportunity to make a significant change for the betterment of everyone in the business. 

Oh, and btw, the photo organizations cannot be involved in this sort of talk because of all sorts of potential anti-trust law issues. Don’t get mad at them…it’s not their fault.